What are the errors handled by the operating system?

References

  1. Randell, B.: Operating Systems: The Problems of Performance and Reliability. In: Proceedings of IFIP Congress, vol. 71(1), pp. 281–290 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denning, P.J.: Fault Tolerant Operating Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 8(4), 359–389 (1976)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, I., Iyer, R.K.: Faults, Symptoms, and Software Fault Tolerance in the Tandem GUARDIAN 1990 Operating System. In: FTCS, pp. 20–29 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swift, M.M., Bershad, B.N., Levy, H.M.: Improving the Reliability of Commodity Operating Systems. In: Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 207–222. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Patterson, D., Brown, A., Broadwell, P., Candea, G., Chen, M., Cutler, J., Enriquez, P., Fox, A., Kiciman, E., Merzbacher, M., Oppenheimer, D., Sastry, N., Tetzlaff, W., Traupman, J., Treuhaft, N.: Recovery Oriented Computing (ROC): Motivation, Definition, Techniques, and Case Studies. Technical report, Berkeley, CA, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chou, A., Yang, J., Chelf, B., Hallem, S., Engler, D.R.: An Empirical Study of Operating System Errors. In: Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 73–88 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ganapathi, A.: Why Does Windows Crash? Technical Report UCB/CSD-05-1393, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blue Screen, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q129845/

  9. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C.E.: Basic Concepts and Taxonomy of Dependable and Secure Computing. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 1(1), 11–33 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Candea, G., Kawamoto, S., Fujiki, Y., Friedman, G., Fox, A.: Microreboot – A Technique for Cheap Recovery. In: Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, San Francisco, CA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Demsky, B., Rinard, M.: Automatic Data Structure Repair for Self-Healing Systems. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Algorithms and Architectures for Self-Managed Systems, San Diego, California (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swift, M.M., Annamalai, M., Bershad, B.N., Levy, H.M.: Recovering Device Drivers. In: Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 1–16 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell, R.H., Johnston, G.M., Russo, V.: Choices (Class Hierarchical Open Interface for Custom Embedded Systems). ACM Operating Systems Review 21(3), 9–17 (1987)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. de Dinechin, C.: C++ Exception Handling. IEEE Concurrency 8(4), 72–79 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Cameron, D., Faust, P., Lenkov, D., Mehta, M.: A Portable Implementation of C++ Exception Handling. In: USENIX C++ Conference, USENIX, pp. 225–243 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Glyfason, H.I., Hjalmtysson, G.: Exceptional Kernel: Using C++ Exceptions in the Linux Kernel (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Advantages of Exceptions, http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/exceptions/advantages.html

  18. Campbell, R.H., Islam, N., Johnson, R., Kougiouris, P., Madany, P.: Choices, Frameworks and Refinement. In: Cabrera, L.-F., Russo, V., Shapiro, M. (eds.) Object-Orientation in Operating Systems, pp. 9–15. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1991)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Russo, V.F., Madany, P.W., Campbell, R.H.: C++ and Operating Systems Performance a Case Study. In: USENIX C++ Conference, San Francisco, CA, pp. 103–114 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raila, D.: The Choices Object-oriented Operating System on the Sparc Architecture. Technical report, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, L.: PC-Choices Object-oriented Operating System. Technical report, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dike, J.: A user-mode port of the Linux kernel. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Linux Showcase and Conference, Atlanta, Georgia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tan, S., Raila, D., Liao, W., Campbell, R.: Virtual Hardware for Operating System Development. Technical report, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Texas Instruments OMAP Platform, http://focus.ti.com/omap/docs/omaphomepage.tsp

  25. Bellard, F.: QEMU, a Fast and Portable Dynamic Translator. In: USENIX Annual Technical Conference, FREENIX Track (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. ARM Integrator Family, http://www.arm.com/miscPDFs/8877.pdf

  27. Qin, F., Tucek, J., Sundaresan, J., Zhou, Y.: Rx: Treating Bugs as Allergies - A Safe Method to Survive Software Failures. In: Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 235–248 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, R., Tripathi, A.: Issues with Exception Handling in Object-Oriented Systems. In: European Conference in Object-Oriented Computing (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tools Interface Standards: DWARF Debugging Information Format, http://www.arm.com/pdfs/TIS-DWARF2.pdf

  30. Codesourcery, http://www.codesourcery.com

  31. Exception Handling ABI for the ARMTMarchitecture, http://www.arm.com/miscPDFs/8034.pdf

  32. Candea, G., Fox, A.: Recursive Restartability: Turning the Reboot Sledgehammer into a Scalpel. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, p. 125. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. Drew, S., Gouph, K., Ledermann, J.: Implementing zero overhead exception handling. Technical report, Queensland University of Technology (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schilling, J.L.: Optimizing away C++ exception handling. SIGPLAN Not. 33(8), 40–47 (1998)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Thekkath, C.A., Levy, H.M.: Hardware and software support for efficient exception handling. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, San Jose, California, pp. 110–119 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  36. ISO 14882: C++ Programming Language, http://www.iso.ch/

  37. Bershad, B.N., Savage, S., Pardyak, P., Sirer, E.G., Fiuczynski, M., Becker, D., Eggers, S., Chambers, C.: Extensibility, Safety and Performance in the SPIN Operating System. In: 15th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Copper Mountain, Colorado, pp. 267–284 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vinoski, S.: Distributed Object Computing with Corba. C++ Report Magazine (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Microsoft .NET, http://www.microsoft.com/net/

  40. Katchabaw, M.J., Lutfiyya, H.L., Marshall, A.D., Bauer, M.A.: Policy-driven fault management in distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the The Seventh International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, p. 236. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Zeng, L., Lei, H., Jeng, J.J., Chung, J.Y., Benatallah, B.: Policy-Driven Exception-Management for Composite Web Services. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology, pp. 355–363 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Torres-Pomales, W.: Software Fault Tolerance: A Tutorial. Technical Report NASA/TM-2000-210616, NASA Langley Research Center (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gray, J.: Why do computers stop and what can be done about it? In: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Reliability in Distributed Software and Database Systems, pp. 3–12 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rinard, M., Cadar, C., Dumitran, D., Roy, D.M., Leu, T., William, S., Beebee, J.: Enhancing Server Availability and Security Through Failure-Oblivious Computing. In: Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 303–316 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bressoud, T.C., Schneider, F.B.: Hypervisor-based fault tolerance. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 14(1), 80–107 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. Sidiroglou, S., Locasto, M.E., Boyd, S.W., Keromytis, A.D.: Building a Reactive Immune System for Software Services. In: USENIX 2005 Annual Technical Conference (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Randell, B.: System structure for software fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Reliable Software, pp. 437–449 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Avizienis, A.: The N-Version Approach to Fault - Tolerant Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1491–1501 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chandra, S., Chen, P.M.: The Impact of Recovery Mechanisms on the Likelihood of Saving Corrupted State. In: ISSRE, pp. 91–101 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references