Top 10 tân binh triều đại 2022 năm 2022
|
POSTED ON March 30, 2021 / IN Documentary Toolkit BY: Show  This Q&A was originally published in the Winter 2021 issue of Documentary magazine, a publication of the International Documentary Association, a nonprofit media arts organization based in Los Angeles. A “work for hire” clause in many instances gives ownership of a creator’s work to the creator’s employer as if the employer were the author from the moment of inception. This contradicts the general rule that the creator of a work owns the copyright. Knowing when you’re creating a work for hire, where your employer will own the copyright, or having one made for you, where you will own the copyright as employer, is important. Under copyright law, works for hire come about in one of two ways: Either they’re prepared by “regular” employees within the scope of their employment or they’re created by independent contractors if a pair of conditions are met. To determine whether or not employment is “regular,” factors like these are taken into account: Are services provided on the employer’s premises? Does the employer provide benefits and take withholding from the employee’s paycheck? Is there a salary rather than payment by project? Does the employer have the right to assign additional projects? Affirmative answers point toward regular employment. To determine whether or not employees are acting within the scope of their employment when they create something depends on factors such as how the workday is defined (are the hours fixed or fluid?) and the nature of the creation (is it in the same category as day-to-day work effort?). For example, if an employee is hired full-time to provide a documentary script and makes a scripted fictional film when not working on the documentary, that film is not a work for hire for her regular employer. Creators whose work is ordered or commissioned by an employer but who are not regular employees are independent contractors, but not everything an independent contractor creates is a work for hire. Two conditions must be satisfied for work-for-hire status. First, the works must fit into one of nine specified categories, the most notable of which are audiovisual works and supplementary works (a broad category that includes musical arrangements); and second, both the creator and the commissioning party must sign a written agreement—generally before the work is created—characterizing the work as a work for hire. If either of these conditions is not met, then the copyright in the creator’s work belongs to the creator, at least in the first instance. I say in the first instance because a typical work-for-hire clause in a production services agreement or other employment contract has two parts. The first part says that everything the creative professional creates within the scope of his employment is a work for hire. The second part says that to the extent the creative professional’s work is not a work for hire, then she assigns all rights to the employer. In other words, if it’s not a work for hire, the employer still owns all rights—but through a written assignment rather than from inception. (Copyrights can only be assigned in writing.) From the employer’s point of view, this belt-and-suspenders approach is critical to securing a clean chain of title ending with the employer. Without this two-pronged approach, there may be uncertainty about who owns the finished film, making it difficult to sell or license rights in it. But employers should still favor work-for-hire status over ownership-by-assignment because grants of rights under copyright in the US can be terminated, usually 35-40 years after the grant. An employer’s rights in a work for hire made for that employer, either by a “regular” employee or by an independent contractor with both conditions satisfied, can never be terminated. Can a work that doesn’t satisfy the criteria for work-for-hire status become one by agreement of the parties, say in a contractual clause? The answer is negative: an employer cannot convert a work that doesn’t satisfy work-for-hire criteria into a work for hire simply by having the individual creator agree to it. A work either originates as a work for hire or it doesn’t, and that status is permanent. In summary, if you are a filmmaker hiring a sound person, or a cinematographer, editor, producer, researcher or script writer, or most anyone else, and you intend that you or your company own the copyright in the finished film, then you should hire that person with a written contract that includes a work-for-hire clause accompanied by an assignment in the alternative. If you are a creative professional being hired to work on a film and you don’t want to transfer the copyright to an employer—perhaps because you intend to be a co-owner, or you wish to license an independently copyrightable contribution like a story rather than assign it—then you should avoid signing a contract with an assignment. That is, unless you are a regular employee acting within the scope of your employment, in which case your work product is automatically a work for hire without anyone signing anything. Some fantasy football dynasty teams don’t need an entire season to know if they should be jockeying for the first overall pick in next year’s rookie draft. Making an honest assessment of ones team is critical in building a dynasty. So why not take a look into the future? Get some names rattling around the old noggin to understand who to look for on Saturdays and to get a good look at these players before the underwear olympics. Here’s my way-too-early big board for this incoming class of rookies. I’ve got my top players at each position for 2023 fantasy football. Quarterbacks1. Bryce Young, Alabama Young is a quarterback with a quick release and a ton of poise at the position. He doesn’t have the size that C.J. Stroud has, but Young is more like a slightly taller Kyler Murray and he scoots like him, too. He can absolutely rip the ball downfield both off platform and on.
2. C.J. Stroud, Ohio State Stroud has a big arm and can put the ball anywhere on the field. He’s got great size for a QB and can cover a lot of ground with his long strides. He’s had a lot of help the past two seasons in the forms of Chris Olave, Garrett Wilson, and Jaxon Smith-Njigba. Despite that, he keeps his eyes downfield when working through his progressions. The difference between Young and Stroud may just come down to situation. 3. Cam Ward, Washington State Running Backs1. Bijan Robinson, Texas Robinson is a powerful back, who has really good hands coming out of the backfield. The most complete back in this year’s crop of prospects, Robinson is a capable pass blocker and adept route runner for a running back. He’s even lined up in the slot for Texas. If Robinson isn’t the first pick your dynasty rookie drafts, someone else really exploded. He might be the closest player as a prospect to Saquon Barkley as we’ve had.
2. Jahmyr Gibbs, Alabama Gibbs wants to give Robinson a run for his money as the top back off the board, and anyone selecting him surely won’t be disappointed. He’s got great balance and breakaway speed that will make him a problem for opposing defenses. Alabama uses Gibbs all over the formation as his versatility makes him a fun weapon. 3. Tank Bigsby, Auburn Ironically, Tank is more of an agile runner than a bruiser. Bigsby is a shifty runner who can cut sharply before exploding. However, Bigsby can easily break through arm tackles and push his way to the second level of the defense. With open field in front of him, Bigsby can run away for explosive plays. 4.
Zach Evans, Ole Miss Wide Receivers1. Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Ohio State JSN was often overshadowed by former first-round picks Olave and Wilson. But like Ja’Marr Chase at LSU with Justin Jefferson and Terrace Marshall, Smith-Njigba may be the better prospect than the two receivers drafted from the school in the season prior. He set the Big Ten receiving record in 2021 with 1,606 yards and will just turn 21 before the NFL draft in 2023. Smith-Njigba is a technician when running his routes. He’s not an elite burner, so he’s not pulling away from anyone on the field, but he creates good separation with elite spatial awareness and continuing to work after the play breaks down. In a league where zone looks and Cover 2-high defenses are taking over the league, a player like JSN can be a salve to an anemic offense. 2. Kayshon Boutte, LSU If you’re attempting to wrap up Boutte after he’s got the ball in his hands, you better have the right angle. Kayshon Boutte is a speedy wideout who can catch the ball away from his body well. He’s a legitimate deep threat, but that doesn’t prevent him from operating at other levels of the field. He can stretch the field vertically and horizontally. Like Justin Jefferson, Boutte plays much bigger on the field and can line up in the slot and outside as the X.
3. Jordan Addison, USC Fully in the camp that Jordan Addison helped make Kenny Pickett a first-round QB this past year and it’s easy to see why. After transferring to USC from Pitt, Addison immediately showed against Stanford how agile of a player he is and how well he can take the top off of a defense. His feet are so very quick and his cuts sharp. Operating in the slot can make him a very distracting jet sweep/motion player for any offense. However, he does have a slight frame and will need to pack on more weight to withstand the rigors of a full NFL season and to withstand press coverage. 4. Quentin Johnston, TCU 5. Josh Downs, UNC 6. Jermaine Burton, Alabama 7. Marvin Mims, Oklahoma 8. Dontay Demus Jr., Maryland 9. A.T.Perry, Wake Forest 10. Parker Washington, Bang Penn Kết thúc chặt chẽ1. Michael Mayer, Notre Dame 2. Jaheim Bell, South Carolina 3. Tucker Kraft, SDSU Tôi nên phác thảo những tân binh nào trong triều đại?Không có gì kích thích các cầu thủ Dynasty League như một dự thảo tân binh !.. Hội trường Breece, RB, NYJ..... Drake London, WR, ATL..... Treyylon Burks, WR, mười..... Garrett Wilson, WR, NYJ..... Ken Walker, RB, Biển .. Ai là tân binh giỏi nhất năm 2022?Top NFL Rookies 2022: Xếp hạng 10 năm đầu tiên tốt nhất, cộng với risers, ..... Nước sốt Gardner, CB, New York Jets .. Chris Olave, WR, New Orleans Saints .. Dameon Pierce, RB, Houston Texans .. Kenneth Walker III, RB, Seattle Seahawks .. Tariq Woolen, CB, Seattle Seahawks .. Garrett Wilson, WR, New York Jets .. Tôi nên soạn thảo ai trong triều đại?DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT.. Jonathan Taylor, RB, Indianapolis Colts .. Justin Jefferson, WR, Minnesota Vikings .. Ja'Marr Chase, WR, Cincinnati Bengals .. Najee Harris, RB, Pittsburgh Steelers .. D'Andre Swift, RB, Detroit Lions .. Cooper Kupp, WR, Los Angeles Rams .. Kyle Pitts, Te, Atlanta Falcons .. Javonte Williams, RB, Denver Broncos .. 10 tân binh hàng đầu trong NFL năm nay là ai?Bảng xếp hạng tân binh NFL ở điểm giữa của mùa giải 2022: Bốn Seahawks trong Top 25, nhưng Jets 'Suran Gardner ở số ... Nước sốt Gardner.Máy bay phản lực New York · CB..... Chris Olave.New Orleans Saints · Wr..... Tariq Woolen.Seattle Seahawks · CB..... Dameon Pierce.Houston Texans · RB..... Garrett Wilson.Máy bay phản lực New York · WR..... Nr..... Aidan Hutchinson..... Devin Lloyd .. |
