Core 2 Quad vs i3 2nd gen
|
 Show Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 on one side and the Intel Core i3-2100 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.4GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page. Specifications:
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors. Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc. Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability. The processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-2100 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i3-2100 is less. The Intel Core i3-2100 was started more recently. Performances :Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
In single core, the difference is -20%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
In single core, the difference is -12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
In single core, the difference is -27%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
In single core, the difference is 49%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity. On Windows 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 71%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%. On Linux 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 11%. On Mac OS X 64-bit:
In single core, the difference is 72%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. Equivalence:Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 AMD equivalentIntel Core i3-2100 AMD equivalent See also:Intel Core i3-2100T Is i3 better than Core 2 Quad?Gaming Performance Comparison
In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core i3-2100 3.1GHz is noticeably better than the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz when it comes to running the latest games.
Is Core 2 Quad still good for gaming?Yes. It is excellent. Unfortunately, it may be a poor value. The i3–10100 is hyperthreaded and still clocks to about 4.1GHz all-core for gaming.
How old is i3 2nd generation?In 2011 the 2nd generation of the Core i3 processors was introduced.
Is i3 second gen good for gaming?Is an i3 good for gaming? Yes, an i3 is decent enough to run a lot of modern games at 60 frames per second when equipped with a proper graphics card. Just don't expect triple-digit frame rates at high-end settings.
|
