Which interest group regularly files cases seeking to protect individual rights?
Main content Show
Constitutional Concepts: Crossfire DiscussionThese conversations among the students are called Crossfire Discussions or Crossfires because they stimulate debate. One of the learning objectives of this exercise is to give students more experience with civil discourse on controversial topics. The students do independent research on their topic in preparation for their Constitutional Crossfire Discussion. Students are organized into Crossfire Discussion groups according to their interest in the following topics:
Rules of CivilityDuring this exercise, Crossfire Discussion group members are to exercise civility toward each other. Students must wait to be recognized by the student moderator before speaking. No one else is to speak to the group or to other individuals when another student has the floor. Participants are expected to 1) listen to the positions taken by others; 2) ask clarifying questions of others; and 3) build on, agree, or disagree with the previous speakers' comments. Students are not to make disparaging remarks about others. Although heated debate is to be expected (and, to an extent, encouraged), the conversation should not devolve into sarcastic or disrespectful remarks, inappropriate facial expressions, or personal comments of any kind. Positions should be supported by evidence, not emotion. Guidelines for Making a Legal ArgumentStudents are to base their arguments on their legal research. They should provide a legally sound reason for their arguments and not simply assert their personal feelings. To make a legally sound argument, students should connect their statements to appropriate Constitutional provisions, court cases, and/or laws. Participants may bolster their position by comparing and contrasting the facts of two or more cases. If no specific legal authority can be cited, then students are encouraged to put forth their own opinions, but they should base their position on logic and provide other relevant supporting materials. In short, arguments should be grounded in logic, not emotion. Constitution Day: Crossfire Discussion QuestionsThe Importance of a Written Constitution
Separation of Powers
Federalism
Individual Rights
DISCLAIMER: These resources are created by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts for educational purposes only. They may not reflect the current state of the law, and are not intended to provide legal advice, guidance on litigation, or commentary on any pending case or legislation. What groups have turned the Supreme Court to protect their civil rights?What other Americans have turned to the Supreme Court to protect their civil rights? Other enraged groups were Chinese-Americans, Japanese-Americans, Jews, American Indians, Hispanic Americans, and women. A specific example is the case of Korematsu against the United States following Pearl Harbor.
What does the supreme court want?As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.
Which case established the right to privacy quizlet?Right to privacy - Roe v. Wade, 9th and 14th Amendments.
How does public opinion affect the Supreme Court quizlet?How has public opinion influenced the Supreme Court? The Court may sometimes delay issuing a decision on a certain issue based on expected reaction by the public. The public indirectly chooses the justices themselves, who ultimately reflect public opinion in their decisions.
|