Which is not true about economic order quantity?

  1. A decrease in demand will increase the EOQ value
  2. If an actual order quantity is smaller than-the EOQ, the annual holding cost is less than the annual ordering cost.
  3. An increase in holding cost will increase the EOQ value.
  4. In the EOQ formula there is an inverse relationship between setup and carrying costs.

Answer [Detailed Solution Below]

Option 2 : If an actual order quantity is smaller than-the EOQ, the annual holding cost is less than the annual ordering cost.

Free

English Language Free Mock Test

15 Questions 15 Marks 12 Mins

Concept:

Economic order quantity

Economic order quantity is that size of the order which helps in minimizing the total annual cost of inventory in the organization.

When the size of the order increases, the ordering costs [cost of purchasing, inspection, etc.] will decrease whereas the inventory carrying costs [costs of storage, insurance, etc.] will increase. Economic Order Quantity [EOQ] is that size of order which minimizes total annual costs of carrying and cost of ordering.

The ordering quantity Q* at which holding cost becomes equal to ordering cost and the total inventory cost is minimum is known as Economic order Quantity [EOQ].

At EOQ:

Ordering cost = Holding cost

\[\frac{D}{{{Q^*}}}{C_o} = \frac{{{Q^*}}}{2}{C_h} \Rightarrow {Q^*} = \sqrt {\frac{{2D{C_o}}}{{{C_h}}}} \]

D = Annual or yearly demand of inventory [unit/year]

Q = Quantity to be ordered at each order point [unit/order]

Co = Cost of placing one order [Rs/order]

Ch = Cost of holding one unit in inventory for one complete year [Rs/unit/year]

if the total ordering quantity is less than the EOQ quantity, then the holding cost is less than the ordering quantity.

Recommended textbook solutions

Principles of Economics

8th EditionN. Gregory Mankiw

1,335 solutions

Statistics for Business and Economics

13th EditionDavid R. Anderson, Dennis J. Sweeney, James J Cochran, Jeffrey D. Camm, Thomas A. Williams

1,692 solutions

Financial Accounting

4th EditionDon Herrmann, J. David Spiceland, Wayne Thomas

1,097 solutions

Introductory Business Statistics

1st EditionAlexander Holmes, Barbara Illowsky, Susan Dean

2,174 solutions

The economic order quantity [EOQ] model is a fairly popular means of calculating inventory reorder quantities and working out how many orders to place per annum. However, EOQ is often criticised for being over-simplistic and relying on consistent data inputs which don’t really reflect reality. In this post we take a closer look at the economic order quantity model and its limitations.

What is Economic Order Quantity [EOQ]?

The Economic Order Quantity [EOQ] is the ideal quantity at which inventory carrying costs and ordering costs are both at their lowest. The EOQ model is used by inventory planners to work out the most ‘cost effective’ amount of stock to reorder.

Economies of scale states that the more goods you procure in one order, the lower the ordering cost per unit. But, at the same time, the more items you hold at one time in your warehouse, the higher your carrying costs will be. The economic order quantity will identify when both of these costs are at their lowest.

Our blog post on how to calculate economic order quantity gives you a working example of how to use the formula.

Limitations of the Economic Order Quantity [EOQ] model

Many inventory planners think that finding the right EOQ for each item they stock will help them achieve lower inventory costs. And, on paper, this maybe the case. But, in reality there are many limitations to this over-simplistic framework. Here are some key problems:

How do you deal with demand fluctuations?

Using the EOQ model would be relatively simple for a business that has consistent demand for each inventory item throughout the year – but this is often not the case. Firstly, as items move through their product lifecycle their demand will change. For example, products in the growth stage will see demand increase over time, whilst those at the end of maturity and facing decline will tend to see demand get lumpier and more inconsistent before it drops off.

Secondly, many products have seasonal demand, where sales will rise and fall at certain times of the year. Simply calculating your EOQ at the start of the year and sticking to it could lead to periods of stockouts when demand is high, or excess inventory building up in the warehouse when it falls off, because reordering has not considered seasonal peaks and troughs.

Finally, demand will be influenced by an item’s selling price and promotional activity.

In order to stay on top of demand fluctuations you would need to recalculate your EOQ on a regular basis, and, if you have a large number of SKUs to manage, this could become a time-consuming and impractical task.

Can my warehouse and staff manage more frequent purchase cycles?

In our working EOQ example, the EOQ calculation determined that the inventory planning team needed to place orders for their best-selling spinning top approx. 14 times per year – that’s more than once a month.

While EOQ gives you the best reorder quantities to minimise costs, you also need to consider if your planning team and your warehouse staff can practically manage the recommended frequency of orders and deliveries. Plus, EOQ will give you a different reorder frequency for every item you carry – how do you keep track of the ordering schedule for every inventory item when they could all be at different times?

The EOQ model fails to consider current stock levels in your warehouse network

If your demand drops between placing one order and the next, you may find you don’t need to order the same quantity as your original EOQ formula recommended. Simply following the formula without revision could lead to excess inventory building up in your warehouse.

In addition, your demand for certain items may vary from one warehouse location to another. Therefore, simply reordering items based solely on EOQ can be a waste of resources if the items you need are simply in a different stocking location. In this case, rather than reordering, redistributing those items to where they are needed within your network is a more valuable use of time.

All items in your warehouse are not of equal value

In many businesses, some items will be more profitable than others and some will cost more to sell than others. The EOQ model, however, treats all inventory items the same, regardless of their value to the business. It assumes you need to stock every item with equal importance and assumes that every item has fixed costs that never fluctuate.

This means you could find that you’re wasting valuable space on items that you don’t need to have in stock at the expense of running out of your best-sellers.

Prioritising your higher demand and more valuable SKUs will ensure that you keep your customer service levels up. You can determine which SKUs are your most valuable with ABC analysis.

Will EOQ orders meet the minimum order quantity [MOQ] requirements of your suppliers?

Ordering a little and often gives inventory managers more flexibility to align purchasing patterns with actual customer demand. But many suppliers require a minimum order quantity [MOQ] before they send out a shipment. So you still may end up ordering more than your EOQ formula recommends.

EOQ assumes immediate availability of stock

The EOQ model does not take into account supplier lead times, it simply tells you how much to order based on demand. To cover lead times you may want to add a level of safety stock, but if deliveries are late you could find you’re left unable to fulfil important orders.

Overcoming problems with the Economic Order Quantity model

While this isn’t an exhaustive list of EOQ limitations, it clearly demonstrates that using the economic order quantity as a reordering method will lead to inventory management issues.

There are many other ways to calculate reorder points and reorder quantities – EOQ is just one option. However, effective inventory replenishment requires the constant monitoring of demand, current stock quantities, pick frequencies, safety stock levels, supplier lead times… the list goes on. With so many variables to consider, it’s wise to enlist the help of software. This will speed up otherwise manual calculations and help ensure data accuracy.

EazyStock is an inventory optimisation tool that plugs into ERP systems and automatically calculates reorder quantities. It carries out statistical demand forecasting, sets dynamic inventory levels and recommends when to reorder and by how much. With EazyStock, inventory planners don’t have to spend hours number crunching in excel spreadsheets, instead they have access to a wealth of accurate inventory data in EazyStock that they can use to manage their inventory and ensure reordering reflects supply and demand variables.

If you’d like to know more about how EazyStock can improve the accuracy and efficiency of your inventory planning, contact us for a demo.

Which is true about the economic order quantity?

Economic order quantity is an inventory management technique that helps make efficient inventory management decisions. It refers to the optimal amount of inventory a company should purchase in order to meet its demand while minimizing its holding and storage costs.

Which is not an assumption of EOQ?

∴ So, stochastic demand is not an underlying assumption of the basic EOQ model.

Which of the following statements about EOQ model is true?

The correct answer is b. An increase in demand will increase the EOQ.

What is economic order quantity?

Economic order quantity [EOQ] is a calculation companies perform that represents their ideal order size, allowing them to meet demand without overspending. Inventory managers calculate EOQ to minimize holding costs and excess inventory.

Bài Viết Liên Quan

Chủ Đề