What factors should the auditors take into account when setting the materiality level?
Materiality = quantity and qualityBoth the amount (quantity) and nature (quality) of misstatements are relevant to deciding what is material. Show
How does materiality apply in an audit?The objective of a financial statement audit is to enable the auditor to express an opinion as to whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework. This is a separate responsibility and a separate decision from that made by the entity itself when preparing the financial statements. In auditing, materiality means not just a quantified amount, but the effect that amount will have in various contexts. During the audit planning process the auditor decides what the level of materiality will be, taking into account the entirety of the financial statements to be audited. Materiality relates to both the content of the financial statements and the level and type of testing to be done. The decision is based on judgements about the size, nature and particular circumstances of misstatements (or omissions) that could influence users of the financial reports. In addition, the decision is influenced by legislative and regulatory requirements and public expectations. If, during the audit, the auditor acquires information that would have caused it to determine a different materiality level, it will revise the materiality level accordingly. [toc-this] PrinciplesConcept of materialityMateriality is a fundamental concept in financial and compliance audit. It sets the level of deviation that the auditor considers is likely to influence the decisions of the intended users. In theory, deviations, or errors, are material if they, individually or aggregated with other errors, would reasonably affect the underlying audit conclusions or the decisions of the addressees of the audit report. Users of information in the EU context, who must be considered when determining materiality, are primarily the European Parliament and Council (in particular due to the discharge procedure) but also the Commission and other EU institutions, member state authorities, media and the general public. Given the variety of users, determining materiality is a matter of professional judgement. An item or group of items may be material due to their amount (quantitative materiality), nature or the context in which the deviation occurs (qualitative materiality). There is a relationship between materiality and the level of audit risk. Furthermore, this threshold serves as a determining factor both in the calculation of sample sizes for substantive testing and in the interpretation of the audit results achieved. Setting materiality limits helps the auditor to plan the audit so as to ensure that material deviations are detected by audit tests and resources are employed economically, efficiently and effectively. Auditing to a stricter (lower) materiality threshold requires more audit testing; however, the auditor must avoid “over-auditing" in areas that do not merit extensive work. Materiality in different phases of auditMateriality should be considered by the auditor during:
The auditor should document the materiality levels and changes made thereto during the audit. Quantitative materialityQuantitative materiality is determined by setting a numerical value. The numerical value is achieved by taking a percentage of an appropriate base, which both reflect, in the auditor's judgement, the measures that users of the information are most likely to consider important.
Qualitative materialityCertain types of misstatements or non-compliance, while not quantitatively material, may - because of their nature or because of the context in which they arise - be qualitatively material and thus have an impact on the audit conclusion reached. Qualitative materiality includes items that may be either:
[toggles] [toggle title="Examples%20of%20issues%20material%20by%20nature%20or%20context%20to%20be%20disclosed%3A"]
[/toggle] [/toggles] InstructionsECA materiality thresholdFor ECA, the threshold percentage is between 0,5% and 2%. While the choice is a matter of judgement, a threshold of 2% is generally used. Based on users’ expectations a different threshold may be applied. In addition to the threshold percentage, a ceiling may also be set in terms of the absolute amount. Reliability auditsIn case of consolidated annual accounts of the EU, the materiality for the financial statements as a whole is fixed at 2 % of the total amount of the liabilities. We determine a performance materiality level for each item of the balance sheet. We take into account the nature and extent of misstatements identified in previous years and expectations in relation to misstatements in the current period. We consider that misstatements of balance sheet items less than 50 million euro are not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements. We consider the cumulative impact of uncorrected misstatements on the accounts. Legality and regularity auditsIn legality and regularity audits the base is typically total expenditure or total revenue. For example:
Materiality and systems failures regarding non-complianceIt would not be appropriate to use the materiality threshold of 2% as the only benchmark in the context of systems failures regarding non-compliance. In fact, systems weaknesses may be a management risk without in themselves resulting in actual errors of non-compliance, or may be a risk to compliance without materialising. The quality or effectiveness of the internal control systems can be determined solely on the basis of the materiality threshold of 2% if the audit provided a reasonable assurance (for instance, based on sufficient tests of controls and/or substantive tests):
What four factors are generally considered in determining materiality?The different characteristics of materiality need to be considered when applying it: the pervasiveness of the concept in IFRS; the importance of management's use of judgement; who the primary users of the financial statements are and what decisions they make based on those financial statements; the need for a ...
What are materiality factors?Materiality, in the context of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG), refers to the effectiveness and financial significance of a specific measure as part of a company's overall ESG analysis. Material factors are financial elements deemed fundamental to the long-term success of a company's ESG strategy.
What factors affect performance materiality?Factors Considered for Calculating Performance Materiality:
Knowledge obtained from the prior year audit of the same entity, Understanding of the client and its industry, Auditor Professional Judgement, Misstatements or errors noted during the previous year audits etc.
What influences the materiality of the company being audited?Judgements about materiality are made in the light of surrounding circumstances. They are affected by auditors' perceptions of the financial information needs of users of the financial statements, and by the size or nature (or both) of a misstatement. The concept of materiality is therefore fundamental to the audit.
|