So sánh gt 730 và gt 630 năm 2024

Tên GPU GK107 GF108 Phiên bản GPU GK107-301-A2 GF108-400-A1 Kiến trúc Kepler Fermi Nhà sản xuất TSMC TSMC Kích thước tiến trình 28 nm 40 nm Bóng bán dẫn 1,270 million 585 million Kích thước chết 118 mm² 116 mm²

Card đồ hoạ

Ngày phát hành Apr 24th, 2012 Jun 18th, 2014 Thế hệ GeForce 600 GeForce 700 Sản xuất End-of-life End-of-life Giao diện Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16 Tiền nhiệm GeForce 500 GeForce 600 Kế vị GeForce 700 GeForce 900

Tốc độ xung nhịp

Xung nhịp GPU 875 MHz 700 MHz xung nhịp bộ nhớ 891 MHz 1782 Mbps effective 800 MHz 1600 Mbps effective Xung nhịp đổ bóng — 1400 MHz

Kích thước bộ nhớ 1024 MB 2 GB Loại bộ nhớ DDR3 DDR3 Bộ nhớ Bus 128 bit 128 bit Băng thông 28.51 GB/s 25.60 GB/s

cấu hình kết xuất

Các đơn vị bóng 192 96 Đơn vị xử lý bề mặt 16 16 ROPs 16 4 Số lượng SMX 1 — Bộ nhớ đệm L1 16 KB [per SMX] 64 KB [per SM] Bộ nhớ đệm L2 256 KB 256 KB Số lượng SM — 2

Hiệu năng lý thuyết

Tỷ lệ điểm ảnh 3.500 GPixel/s 2.800 GPixel/s Tốc độ làm đầy vật liệu 14.00 GTexel/s 11.20 GTexel/s FP32 [float] hiệu năng 336.0 GFLOPS 268.8 GFLOPS FP64 [double] hiệu năng 14.00 GFLOPS [1:24] 22.40 GFLOPS [1:12]

Thiết kế bảng mạch

Chiều rộng khe Single-slot Single-slot Chiều dài 145 mm 5.7 inches 145 mm 5.7 inches Công suất thiết kế 50 W 49 W Bộ nguồn khuyến nghị 250 W 200 W Đầu ra 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA 1x DVI1x HDMI1x VGA Đầu nối nguồn None None Số bảng mạch P2011 P1070, P1071

Tính năng đồ hoạ

DirectX 12 [11_0] 12 [11_0] OpenGL 4.6 4.6 OpenCL 3.0 1.1 Vulkan 1.1 — CUDA 3.0 2.1 Mô hình đổ bóng 5.1 5.1

  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce GT 730

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 630

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.Supports PhysXBased on an outdated architecture [Nvidia Fermi], there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 730

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.Supports PhysXBased on an outdated architecture [Nvidia Fermi], there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GT 630

Based on theoretical specifications.

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 630GeForce GT 730GPU NameGF108 [GF108-400-A1]vsGF108 [GF108-400-A1]Fab Process40 nmvs40 nmDie Size116 mm²vs116 mm²Transistors585 millionvs585 millionShaders96vs96Compute Units2vs2Core clock810 MHzvs700 MHzROPs4vs4TMUs16vs16

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 630GeForce GT 730Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3Bus Width128 bitvs128 bitMemory Speed900 MHz 1800 MHz effectivevs900 MHz 1800 MHz effectiveMemory Size1024 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 630GeForce GT 730TDP65 wattsvs49 wattsRelease Date15 May 2012vs18 Jun 2014

  • GeForce GT 630 3.24 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 730 2.80 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

  • GeForce GT 630 13.00 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 730 11.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

  • GeForce GT 630 28.80 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 730 28.80 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

  • GeForce GT 630 311.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 730 268.80 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696Core clock speed700 MHz810 MHzNumber of transistors585 million585 millionManufacturing process technology40 nm40 nmPower consumption [TDP]49 Watt65 WattTexture fill rate11.2 GT/s12.96Floating-point performance268.8 gflops311.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus [motherboard compatibility], additional power connectors [power supply compatibility].

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16Length145 mm145 mmWidth1-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed1800 MHz1800 MHzMemory bandwidth25.6 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAHDMI++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 [11_0]12 [11_0]Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL1.11.1VulkanN/AN/ACUDA2.12.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 730 outperforms GT 630 by 22% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 [the last being done in 4K resolution if possible], and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 730 outperforms GT 630 by 22% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 730 outperforms GT 630 by 44% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 730 outperforms GT 630 by 19% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GT 730 outperforms GT 630 by 53% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GT 730 outperforms GT 630 by 56% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GT 730 outperforms GT 630 by 43% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GT 730 and GeForce GT 630. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC [SHA256] 35 Mh/s 20 Mh/s Ethereum / ETH [DaggerHashimoto] 1 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 2.14 1.75 Recency 18 June 2014 15 May 2012 Cost $59.99 $99.99 Memory bandwidth 25.6 28.8 Power consumption [TDP] 49 Watt 65 Watt

The GeForce GT 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GT 730

GeForce GT 630

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Chủ Đề